Sunday, December 4, 2011

MPs? no to Bonn, Nato


ISLAMABAD Putting its weight behind the decision of the Defence Committee of the Cabinet, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security endorsed all major DCC decisions, including ban on the Nato supplies and vacation of Shamsi airbase and boycott of Bonn conference.
Military Operations Director General Maj Gen Ishfaq Nadeem briefed the committee?s extra-ordinary session, which was chaired by Senator Mian Raza Rabbani and was also attended by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and a number of federal ministers. The general presented details of the Nato attack on Pakistani border checkposts in Mohmand Agency and informed about the steps being taken by the army to avoid such incursions in future.
Sources aware of the meeting deliberations informed that the members were informed by the Military Operations DG that the Pakistan Army officials deployed along the Pak-Afghan border have been instructed to strike back the intruders in such an eventuality in future and that they need not wait for security permission from the top military commanders for any retaliatory action. The committee members expressed satisfaction over the measures taken by both the political and military leadership of the country and made it loud and clear that government would not tolerate such hostility in future, the sources added.
To a question in a briefing to the media about the deliberations, Federal Minister for Information Firdous Ashiq Awan said that Friday?s session of the committee dealt with a single-point agenda the Nato attacks on Salala checkposts in Mohmand Agency and the government?s steps in response to the incursion.
Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani also gave a detailed briefing to the committee members on the incident and the responsive measures taken by the top military and political leadership of the country. In his opening remarks, the prime minister thanked Chairman Raza Rabbani and members of the committee for convening the meeting to consider the Nov 26 Nato attacks, which caused the loss of precious lives of ?our brave soldiers?.
Gilani said these dastardly attacks in the dead of night cannot but be construed as a grave infringement of Pakistan?s territorial frontiers by Nato/Isaf and definitely compel us to revisit our national security paradigm. These attacks also have serious implications for regional peace and security, he said, adding, ?I, therefore, deemed it important that this committee undertake an in-depth examination of the situation arising from these attacks.
The prime minister briefly recounted the salient developments in the post-Nato attack scenario and Pakistani leaderships response to it. He then called for a holistic review of the whole situation in view of national security and Pakistan?s future engagement with the US and Nato/Isaf.
The prime minister declared that Pakistan does not seek aid or economic assistance from the United States. ?What we seek, in fact demand, is respect for our sovereignty and territorial integrity; a firm and categorical commitment on inviolability of Pakistan?s borders and on non-recurrence of such incidents.?
The notion to give Pakistan a ?to do? list and the mantra of ?do more? have caused immense resentment, the prime minister said. In recent months, there has been a tendency to project Pakistan not as a ?partner? but as the ?problem?, he added. ?Our enormous sacrifices and contribution in the campaign against militancy and terror have not been adequately acknowledged. What is worse is the tendency to make Pakistan into a scapegoat for failings of international policies in Afghanistan.?
He said: Our security and counter-terrorism policy needs to be pursued in a manner that suits Pakistan?s national interests. The only effective way forward is to have complete unity in our ranks and total support of the people of Pakistan. I regret to note that our willingness to cooperate with the international community on counter-terrorism has not been understood in its proper perspective.
While Pakistan continued to protest against the drone attacks, which are clearly illegal and counter-productive, we have also been subjected to numerous cross-border attacks by militants from sanctuaries and safe havens in Afghanistan. Our efforts to improve our relations with Afghanistan and support for Afghan-led and Afghan-owned efforts for reconciliation and peace have been misconstrued and actively subverted by certain quarters. ?Clearly, there is a limit to our patience. Cooperation cannot be a one-way street?.
The terms of our engagement with the United States and Nato/Isaf have to be revisited on the basis of sovereign equality, mutual interest and mutual respect, Gilani maintained. Under these most challenging and difficult circumstances, Pakistan has maintained a principled approach and exercised utmost restraint. However, it would be a grave miscalculation for any one to believe that stability and peace in Afghanistan can be restored or maintained by destabilising Pakistan.
Under no circumstances, will we allow Pakistan?s sovereignty and territorial integrity to be jeopardised by ill-considered and rash actions such as the attacks on our territory by NATO/ISAF. Our patriotic people and valiant armed forces will spare no sacrifice in the defence of their motherland. Instructions have been issued to all units of the Pakistan armed forces to respond, with full force, to any act of aggression and infringement of Pakistan?s territorial frontiers.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/today-headlines/~3/GA6Oxt5ldJM/MPs-no-to-Bonn-Nato

st.louis cardinals st.louis cardinals drag me to hell alot alot are you afraid of the dark are you afraid of the dark

If a fat tax is coming, here's how to make it efficient, effective

Friday, December 2, 2011

A 'sin tax' applied to sweetened goods on store shelves is not the most efficient, effective method of lowering caloric intake from sweet food and would be more disruptive to consumers than necessary, according to Iowa State University research.

With a national debate taking shape about the possibility of a national tax on foods with high sweetener content, ISU economists have examined how such a tax would best be applied.

Rather than assessing a tax on these sugary goods as they are taken through the grocery store checkout lines, the research shows that a better way is to tax the food processers on the amount of caloric sweeteners, such as corn syrup and sugar added in processing before the product hits the shelves.

The economists, John Beghin and Helen Jensen, both professors in the Department of Economics, are quick to point out that they are not advocating for or against any tax, but simply researching how and where a possible sweetener tax would be most effective.

"We are not saying. 'To resolve obesity, here is what you should do,'" said Beghin. "In that sense, we are not advocating anything. We are saying, 'Given that you are considering a panoply of tax instruments, and there is a possibility of a soda tax, is there a better way to use that idea?'"

"This is motivated," added Jensen, "by a lot of ideas out there that say we could tax sweetened products. We wanted to see what the effect of such a tax would be and, alternatively, if you imposed a tax on ingredients, what would be the effect of that."

The research, published in the journal Contemporary Economic Policy, shows that if the goal of a sin tax on sweeteners is to reduce calories consumed, lawmakers should consider taxing the inputs instead of the final product.

Assessing the tax at the processing stage allows food processors to reduce the amount of sweeteners they put into their products. Processors will also have incentives to use more of the lesser-taxed artificial sweeteners, and less of the higher-taxed sweeteners that are heavy in sugary products.

These solutions would also raise the price at the store less than a direct tax on the end product, while reducing the calories attributable to the sweetener, according to the study.

"Taxing the processing ingredients makes more sense when compared with taxing the end product," said Beghin. "You can abate the same number of calories without having consumers face such high prices."

Any new tax on sweeteners, even the tax on food inputs proposed by the study, will cause prices to go up. One drawback of any tax on sweetened goods is the regressive nature of that tax.

In economic terms, regressive taxes are those that impact poorer economic groups more than higher ones.

"Since much of these (sweeter) goods are consumed by poorer economic groups," said Beghin, "you may be increasing the cost of calories for poor people."

The study looks only at calories in food. The research does not make any claims about lowering obesity.

The United States' obesity rate has many factors, and the amount of calories consumed is only one, say the economists.

"We are not looking at health aspects," said Jensen. "Just the consumption of calories from sweetened goods and the disruption to the consumer."

The findings of the study fit generally accepted economic principles that say if you want to change a given behavior or economic decision, you should try to find a policy instrument that is closest to the behavior or decision, according to Beghin.

As part of the study, the two collected data from both government and private sources on industrial food inputs.

"We spent quite a bit of time assembling a data set based on published data on what inputs the food industry uses," said Jensen. "So we know that for all the different food sectors, how much sugar and corn syrup go into that industry group's food processing. You'd be amazed to see how much sweetener goes into food processing."

###

Iowa State University: http://www.iastate.edu

Thanks to Iowa State University for this article.

This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.

This press release has been viewed 66 time(s).

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/115684/If_a_fat_tax_is_coming__here_s_how_to_make_it_efficient__effective

epstein harrisburg pa chynna phillips magic cube slaughterhouse cypher last man standing

Saturday, December 3, 2011

McCready can't go to court due to pregnancy

Country singer Mindy McCready, who had been reported missing, spoke with Florida authorities Wednesday and is aware of a court order to return her 5-year-old son by Thursday afternoon, police said.

Cape Coral Police Lt. Tony Sizemore said McCready and her son are not in the Lee County, Fla., area, and that she is "currently outside of the terms of her family court stipulation." She knows that she is supposed to bring her son back to Lee County by 5 p.m. Thursday, he said.

But the singer says she probably won't be able to comply with the judge's order ? because she is nearly 7 months pregnant with twins.

Speaking exclusively to The Associated Press, McCready said Wednesday that she and her mother have had a long custody battle over Zander. Her mother was awarded guardianship of the boy in 2007.

The state Department of Children and Families said a missing person report was filed with Cape Coral police Tuesday night after McCready took her son Zander from her father's home.

The singer was allowed to visit the boy at her father's home, according to a department spokesman. On Tuesday, DCF discovered that McCready and the boy were not at her father's home.

DCF spokesman Terry Field told The Associated Press the agency asked a Lee County judge for an emergency pickup order, and the judge ruled McCready must return the boy voluntarily by 5 p.m. Thursday or risk an arrest warrant.

Meanwhile, McCready said on Facebook that she is not missing.

"I have been fighting the Florida court system to protect my son, and bring him home," she posted, adding that she spoke with Cape Coral Police via Skype ? something that the agency confirmed.

The singer's brother, Josh McCready, told The Associated Press in a private Facebook message that his sister was "fine."

"Mindy is fine and so is Zander. There is nothing to worry about," he wrote.

  1. More Entertainment stories
    1. Kim abused Kris? Dr. Drew thinks so

      Celebrity psychiatrist Dr. Drew Pinsky believes a fight seen on the season premiere of "Kim and Kourtney Take New York" is...

    2. Teen gets busted for driving high on 'DUI'
    3. Prosecutors OK with Conrad Murray jail time
    4. Chris Meloni in talks for ?True Blood? role
    5. Nicolas Cage on cover of Serbian biology book

Kat Atwood, McCready's publicist, issued a statement Wednesday saying McCready and her son are "safe, healthy and comfortable," and denies that she has done anything wrong. The statement says McCready has been awaiting a court order on whether she would be awarded custody of her son.

"No Amber Alert has been issued; this is not a missing child case," Atwood said in the statement.

According to Aimee McLaughlin of the Childrens Network of Southwest Florida, a case manager filed a missing person report with the Cape Coral Police on Tuesday. The DCF spokesman said Children's Network of Southwest Florida is the Community-Based Care agency for the area.

Since topping the country charts in the mid-1990s with her music, the troubled 36-year-old singer's life has been filled with domestic abuse, drug and DUI arrests and a suicide attempt. In August, she filed a libel suit in Palm Beach County against her own mother and the National Enquirer's parent company, American Media Inc., over a story published in the tabloid newspaper that quoted her mother.

In 2010, she spoke with The Associated Press about her life.

"It is a giant whirlwind of chaos all the time," she said. "I call my life a beautiful mess and organized chaos. It's just always been like that. My entire life, things have been attracted to me and vice versa that turn into chaotic nightmares or I create the chaos myself. I think that's really the life of a celebrity, of a big, huge, giant personality."

In July 2007, she was accused of scuffling with her mother and resisting arrest at her mother's home in Florida. She was sentenced to jail for 60 days for a probation violation and released; she served 30 days in jail. She also lost custody of her son.

And in 2008, McCready was admitted to a Nashville hospital after police said she cut her wrists and took several pills in a suicide attempt.

During the TV show "Celebrity Rehab 3" in 2010 McCready came off as a sympathetic figure, and host Dr. Drew Pinsky called her an angel in the season finale.

On the show she said she suffered from love addiction, not substance abuse. In one of the show's scarier moments, McCready suffered a seizure and was rushed to a hospital where scans showed brain damage.

Also in 2010, police went to McCready's mother's home for a report of an overdose, and McCready was taken to a Florida hospital. However, neither the hospital nor McCready's publicist would say why McCready was hospitalized.

Cape Coral is on Florida's Gulf coast, about 120 miles northwest of Miami.

McCready also fought the release of a tape in which she reportedly talked about former Boston Red Sox and New York Yankees pitcher Roger Clemens, with whom she had an affair as a teenager.

A call to a lawyer representing McCready in the custody case was not immediately returned.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45494644/ns/today-entertainment/

j edgar hoover j edgar hoover jonathan papelbon jonathan papelbon trisomy 13 veterans barbados resorts